|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Vol.2,
No.1, September 2003
|
|||||
|
Newsletter Contents: Tools for Action, Advocacy, and Community Empowerment
|
After a bit of a hiatus, the GEGA Newsletter is back, mainly to do to the addition of Qamar Mahmood as the new GEGA Assistant Coordinator. Qamar will be providing support in various areas of the Secretariat's work, and we are very grateful to have him! GEGA and Equinet recently sponsored a workshop, in cooperation with the Southern African Development Community, on Parliamentary Alliances for Health Equity, which brought together Parliamentarians as well as groups supporting health equity and parliamentary processes to discuss priority equity issues and develop plans for working together to strengthen health equity. Participants of the project include representatives from the South Africa, Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Kenya Equity Gauges, as well as representatives from Malawi and Tanzania. One of the outcomes of the workshop was a set of resolutions regarding the role of parliaments in promoting health equity as well as the need to safeguard health by forming coalitions at the regional level (the resolutions, as well as the workshop program and report of the meeting are available here). We are currently discussing possible areas of follow up work and how co-operation between parliaments and professional and civic resources within Equinet / GEGA and within parliament support agencies can support such work. The World Health Organisation has established a Health Metrics Network. The purpose of the Network is to strengthen the quality, sustainability, integration, and usefulness of health information systems within countries, including for sub-national analysis. The Network includes a Task Force on Integrating Equity into Health Information Systems, and Lexi Bambas, Coordinator of GEGA, has been asked to coordinate the work of this Task Force. She will be taking on this responsibility in addition to her primary work coordinating GEGA. This is an excellent opportunity for promoting GEGA's goal of establishing equity-sensitive information systems within countries, and is expected to directly contribute to our own efforts and to strengthen our long-term potential to support pro-equity policy around the world. The GEGA produced booklet The Equity Gauge: Concepts, Principles, and Guidelines is available at www.gega.org.za. The booklet serves as a primer for anyone interested in developing an Equity Gauge. Training: The University of the Western Cape (Cape Town Gauge) and the Chile Gauge will be offering courses related to health equity analysis and promotion during their Summer Schools in January. Chile's courses will be more oriented toward middle and high-level decision-makers, while the Cape Town courses will be targeted to researchers and health workers. More information, including the specific courses being offered, will be available soon on the GEGA webpage. Gauges Ecuador
Equity Gauge Bangladesh
Equity Gauge Zambia
Equity Gauge Cape
Town Equity Gauge South
Africa Equity Gauge Tools for Action, Advocacy, and Community Empowerment Training Modules on Health Research for Policy, Action and Practice. Version 1.1, June 2003. The Collaborative Training Programme is supported and coordinated by: WHO Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research; Council on Health Research for Development; Global Forum for Health Research ; INCLEN Trust. The goal of this programme is to support strategies to increase the impact of health research on policy, programmes and practice through training and institutional development. The modules focus on practical experience and best practices regarding 1) priority-setting in health research (6 training units); 2) knowledge management (5 training units); 3) advocacy and leadership (5 training units). The modules are designed in a flexible manner and are tailored to the needs and interests of diverse constituencies. They are intended for a diverse set of countries and development situations and their content will be found to be methodologically sound, well tested and of the highest quality and relevance. Many people interested in increasing the impact of health research will benefit from the modules. In particular, research managers, policy analysts within ministries of health and research and continuing education officers may find that training in these subject areas will be a valuable investment. Contact Information: Miguel Gonzalez-Block, Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, 20 avenue Appia, CH 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland blockm@who.int Anthology of Health Communication Materials From HABIT: Vol.6 No. 6 2003. Full document available at: http://www.comminit.com/mahealthanthol/sld-7327.html. Many of the materials are available in Spanish as well as English. The Anthology of Health Communication Materials was collected by the Communication Initiative, a partnership of organizations including UNICEF, PANOS and the Rockefeller Foundation that works on communication projects related to international development. The anthology was commissioned by the Pan American Health Organization in 2002. Research about the importance of health communication is piling up, while resources to help practitioners wade through what works and what doesn't are much scarcer. This month's spotlight falls on a Web site with a peer-reviewed list of health communication materials ranging from academic texts to CD-ROM sets. A team of health communications experts reviewed the final list of 61 materials with an eye toward those products with proven success in the field. Topics include health issues among children and adolescents, gender, HIV/AIDS, reproductive health and family planning, health worker training materials and even tips for promoting health initiatives to the media. Each listing briefly describes the materials and their original audience, and provides information on how to purchase or links to download the materials for free. Several publications from the Bangladesh Equity Gauge are now available in the "Documents" and "Bangladesh Gauge" sections of the GEGA webpage, including The Equity Dialogue newsletter; the BHEW Brochure; the document "Who is vaccinated in Bangladesh? The immunization divide" and a summary of the paper; and "The Bibliographical Alert: Health, Poverty, and Equity," published quarterly by BHEW and compiled by conducting searches of the Internet and popular databases such as Popline and Medline. An especially illustrative document on identifying equity indicators, entitled "Improving and Monitoring the Equity of Health Care Provision: A Discussion of the Selection of Indicators," by David McCoy and Lucy Gilson, is available in A Travelling Seminar on the Attainability and Affordability of Equity in Health Care Provision - Workshop Proceedings, pg 66-79. Is
inequality in Africa really different? Branko Milanovic, May 2003. World
Bank, Development Research Group. Available online as PDF file [44p.]
at: Who Would Gain most from Efforts to Reach the Millennium Development Goals for Health? An Inquiry into the Possibility of Progress that Fails to Reach the Poor. Davidson Gwatkin. Principal Health and Poverty Specialist. The World Bank, 2002. Available online as PDF file [4.6 MB] at: http://poverty.worldbank.org/files/13920_gwatkin1202.pdf. "This paper is an inquiry into the possibility of progress toward the MDGs targets for health that does not significantly benefit the disadvantaged people whom the MDGs are intended to serve. The MDGs health targets, unlike most other prominent MDGs targets, are stated in terms of improvement in societal averages rather than in terms of gains among poor groups within societies...The inquiry begins by examining the implications of two alternative scenarios for progress: a "top-down" scenario, with gains highly concentrated among the better-off; and a converse "bottom-up" scenario, under which gains flow primarily to the poor. Quantitative illustrations for typical countries in Latin America and the Caribbean, South and Southeast Asia, and Sub-Saharan Africa indicate that the amount of benefit accruing to the poor would vary greatly according to the scenario folllowed. The second part of the inquiry examines the plausibility of the two scenarios. The conclusion is that, while the "pure" top-down scenario is unlikely, some approximation of it is considerably less improbable than a bottom-up scenario. The implication is that special efforts will be required to ensure that health and development initiatives reach poor people if they are to gain significantly from progress toward the Millennium Development Goals MDGs health targets....." Has Improved Availability of Health Expenditure Data Contributed to Evidence-Based Policy making? Country Experiences with National Health Accounts. Susan De, Tania Dmytraczenko, Derick Brinkerhoff, Marie Tien. Technical Report No.022 - May 2003. The Partners for Health Reformplus Project. Abt Associates Inc. Bethesda, MD USA. Available online as PDF file [56p.] at: http://www.phrplus.org/Pubs/Tech022_fin.pdf. "National Health Accounts (NHA) is a tool designed to inform the health policy process by providing policymakers with valuable information on the distribution of health funds within the system. NHA was introduced and implemented in a number of middle - and low-income countries in the mid- to late 1990s. This study sets out to determine if NHAs has actually met its principal goal of contributing to evidence-based policymaking. The paper examines the policy impact of National Health Accounts NHA in 21 developing countries from the Latin America and the Caribbean region, East and Southern Africa, the Middle East and North Africa, and the Asia Pacific region. The study describes how policymakers have used National Health Accounts and assesses the various factors and influences that determine the extent to which NHAs impact the policy process......" An Annotated Bibliography on Policy Processes. Jos Mooij, Veronica de Vos. Policy Processes: Working Paper 221 - July 2003. Overseas Development Institute, London, UK. Available online as PDF file at: http://www.odi.org.uk/publications/working_papers/wp221.pdf. "The term 'policy process' is based on the notion that policies are formulated and implemented in particular social and historical contexts, and that these contexts matter - for which issues are put on the policy agenda, for the shape of policies and policy institutions, for budget allocations, for the implementation process and for the outcome of the policies. The idea of 'policy process' stands opposed to that of 'policy as prescription', which assumes that policies are the result of a rational process of problem identification by a benevolent agency (usually the state). While the 'policy as prescription' approach is still important - both in much of the public administration literature as well as in the heads of many policy-makers - there is a fast expanding body of literature that analyses, explains or conceptualises the process dimensions of policy. This literature is a blend of political science, sociology and anthropology. It does not assume that policies are 'natural phenomena' or 'automatic solutions' resulting from particular social problems and it does not privilege the state as an actor fundamentally different from other social actors. The why, how and by whom questions are treated as empirical questions; it is only concrete empirical research that can generate the answers. It is this body of literature that is included in this bibliography......" Applying
an equity lens to child health and mortality: more of the same is Interventions
in the Social Environment to Improve Community Health: Websites The Chile Gauge, which recently relocated to be based in the Universidad de Desarrollo, has updated its webpage at http://www.equidadchile.cl/. The World Health Organization Health Impact Assessment (HIA) website is now live. It provides user-friendly access to international examples of HIA practice and key documents, tools and methods, evaluations, links with individual-nation HIA websites, and highlights relevant HIA work within WHO, Regional Offices and Collaborating Centres. You can visit this at http://www.who.int/hia. Also, the Bulletin of the World Health Organization had a special theme issue of Health Impact Assessment. It includes articles on HIA in policy and practice, perspectives of HIA, case studies from Chad, Slovenia, Thailand and more - you can visit this at http://www.who.int/bulletin/en/. We are still collecting examples of HIA (case studies, completed HIA, toolkits etc). If you wish to contribute the form can be downloaded from http://www.who.int/hia/examples/en/. Any comments or feedback please send to hia@who.int. 10th Canadian Conference on International Health. http://www.csih.org/what/conferences2003.html. The Right to Health: Influencing the Global Agenda: How Research, Advocacy and Action can shape our future. October 26-29, 2003. Ottawa, Canada. Globalization, Justice
and Health: Conference to explore links and build frameworks. The NIH
Clinical Center Department of Clinical Bioethics and the Fogarty International
Center at NIH, along with WHO, will host: "Globalization, Justice
and Health" on November 3-4, 2003 in Washington, DC. The full program
and online registration are available at http://www.bioethics.nih.gov/globalization.html.
The conference will bring together leading thinkers on international trade,
distributive justice and healthcare systems. The goal is to develop a
framework that is essential to ensuring that the forces of globalization
promote, rather than endanger, the health of individuals throughout the
world. Day one will examine key interconnections among globalization,
income and health, as well as related issues of international distributive
justice and international law. The second day will focus on the challenges
of intellectual property rights, international trade in health services
and privatization of the health sector from the standpoint of health systems
and policymakers. Speakers include Jeffrey Sachs, Columbia University;
Julio Frenk Mora, Secretary of Health, Mexico; Uwe Reinhardt, Princeton
University; David Dollar, World Bank; Angus Deaton, Princeton University;
and Richard Wilkinson, University of Nottingham. Contact Carol Coy, 301-562-2341,
ccoy@kra.com, for more information. The "Call for
Abstracts" for the third meeting of the International Society for
Equity in Health -- to be held June 10-12, 2004, in Durban, South Africa
-- is now on the website at: http://www.iseqh.org/en/index.htm.
The Conference theme is: "Pathways to equity in health: Using research
for policy and advocacy". "This Conference of ISEqH will be
hosted by the Health Systems Trust (HST), a South African-based NGO; the
Southern African Regional Network on Equity in Health (EQUINET); and the
Global Equity Gauge Alliance (GEGA), an international consortium of initiatives
to support health equity. The meeting will bring together, researchers,
policy-makers, practitioners and others concerned with equity in health
to develop an international health agenda for governments, universities
and organizations all over the world. Conference will especially encourage
contributions that focus on Pathways through which influences on health
operate; Application of innovative methods for studying and monitoring
equity in health; Analysis to support the design and evaluation of policies,
services and interventions that enhance equity in health; Understanding
processes for policy change to improve equity in health; Using evidence
to enhance public accountability in and social action for health equity
." Scholars in Health Disparities Program. The W.K. Kellogg Foundation and the Center for the Advancement of Health are pleased to announce recruitment for the 2004 cohort of W.K. Kellogg Foundation Scholars in Health Disparities. Center For The Advancement of Health: http://www.cfah.org/programs/kellogg_scholars.cfm. This program challenges post doctoral investigators from a variety of disciplines such as economics, sociology, political science, public health and law, to examine the causes and consider policy solutions for health disparities in race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Research topics funded by this program include the ways by which social, economic, political, environmental and educational inequalities and institutional racism play a role in the creation of health disparities, and the development of policy initiatives that might reduce these disparities. The program provides selected individuals stipends of up to $52,500 per year for one year, plus fringe benefits and a research budget for travel, computer, courses, supplies and other research related expenses. Scholars also have the option to apply for a second year, if desired. Five Scholars will be funded at one of the following participating sites: Harvard Center for Health and Society; University of Michigan Institute for Social Research; Morgan State University Public Health/Urban Health Policy Center; University of California, San Francisco Center on Social Disparities in Health; and Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health Department of Epidemiology. For further information and application materials, visit the Center website at www.cfah.org or contact Barbara Krimgold, Director of the Scholars program, bkrimgold@cfah.org or April Oh, Program Manager, aoh@cfah.org. Deadline for receipt of applications is February 16, 2004 International Fellows in Philanthropy Program. The Johns Hopkins Institute for Policy Studies, Center for Civil Society Studies is pleased to announce a call for applications for the International Fellows in Philanthropy Program for the 2004-2005 academic year. This program based in Baltimore, Maryland, USA, affords an opportunity for advanced study, research, and training for up to eight participants each year who are involved in studying or managing private nonprofit, or philanthropic organizations outside of the United States, or working as NGO liaisons in the public or commercial sectors. Fellowships, which can be an academic year or semester, are available at both the Junior and Senior level. Special funding is available for Fellows from East Africa and for Fellows conducting research on Community Foundations. We are soliciting candidates who: 1) have demonstrated a high degree of interest, experience, and professional competence in research, management,or general leadership related to the voluntary, nongovernmental, nonprofit, or philanthropic sector; or 2) nonprofit liaison officers established by governments and multinational organizations who play a role in linking with nonprofit organizations through project partnerships, legal reform initiatives, and a variety of other activities. Candidates are expected to have attained a university diploma equivalent to the American Bachelors of Arts or Science degree and be capable of carrying out independent research and inquiry. A high degree of English fluency is required as demonstrated by a score of 600 or higher on the TOEFL exam. There are no restrictions as to nationality (except that US citizens are excluded from eligibility). Fellows are required to attend the annual International Fellows in Philanthropy Conference prior to their fellowship year and are strongly encouraged to participate in subsequent annual conferences. For more information, or to download an application, visit: www.jhu.edu/~philfellow or contact Carol Wessner (cwessner@jhu.edu). Directory of International
Grants and Fellowships in the Health Sciences. Updated October, 2002.
Fogarty International Center * National Institutes of Health - USA. Available
online at; http://www.fic.nih.gov/news/directory.html.
The National Institutes of Health is one of many public and private organizations
across the globe that provide international support for biomedical research
and training. Since 1988, the Fogarty International Center has published
the Directory of International Grants and Fellowships in the Health Sciences.
This directory is a comprehensive compilation of international opportunities
in biomedical research. More information or to request a mailed copy (hard
copy) of the Directory of International Grants and Fellowships in the
Health Sciences, contact the Office of Communications at: Office of Communications,
Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Building
31, Room B2C29 - 31 CENTER DR MSC 2220, Bethesda, MD 20892-2220 USA. Telephone:
301-496-2075 Fax: 301-594-1211 E-mail: ficinfo@nih.gov. Useful
Resources See you next month..! |
||||